to be made in self restraint. If people choose to live a life with a moral foundation delaying immediate gratification for the longer term good they’re simply not going to spend as much energy and money on chasing after whims. There’s plenty of money to be made, however, if people live a life free of self- restraint. If a person can be convinced they must be a libertine and mindless consumer, a person who trades the wider and deeper understanding of life for the moment, they can continuously be sold on fads and those who control the shape and direction of those fads will grow rich and powerful. Understand this and you will also begin to understand why Jesus spoke the way he did about money and possessions and take the first steps towards being truly free.
Author: Fr. John Chagnon
Interesting…
As the fortunes of Russia’s super-rich oligarchs begin to crumble, a man who was once one of them has some surprising advice: they should acknowledge their folly in ever believing money could bring happiness, and then follow him back to what he believes is the good life.
German Sterligov has enjoyed sumptuous wealth, sampled the world of glinting limousines, private jets and super-yachts, and mixed with stars at lavish parties, but he gave it all up four years ago to live with his family like a simple tsarist-era peasant in the wilderness, often struggling to make ends meet.
We’re Hungry…
for leaders of simplicity, commitment to service, and little desire for celebrity. We’ve grown tired of the self-aggrandizing, the elites, those who feel ruling is their privilege, and their extravagant lifestyles. Where is the true servant of the public, the executive who sees beyond their office and the lifestyles of those like them? Where is the person in charge who realizes the welfare of those “below” them is intimately intertwined with their own? Where is the powerful one who understands their power is only a moment in time and thus a trust to be managed and not a possession to be exploited? In these times such human beings are hard to find.
Thus the surprise, joy, and even disbelief in a person like Pope Francis. His approach, although it is as old as Christianity itself, appears new. His disregard for meaningless pomp and circumstance, for all the “perks” of the office, seems like a breath of fresh air. To a world, and even a Christian community, jaded by the current understanding of power and leadership he appears as a refreshing anomaly, a person whose ideals and life actually match.
Could it be a ploy? Perhaps. We’ve seen it before, people who are too good to be true because they work hard at it. Yet leaders of all kinds should take notice. The hunger of the common people for such a leader is deep, profound, and a cause for celebration among the masses even when just a sliver of it becomes apparent. There is a great fatigue with private jets, gated neighborhoods, exclusive gatherings, and unnecessary perks among the people who make the lifestyles of the rich and famous possible. The great of this world need to step out of their world, grab a towel, and start washing some feet and not just the feet of their peers. The powerful of this world need to realize anew there’s a difference between respect and compliance and that people have already turned off their speeches in favor of watching their lives. The powerful of the world, indeed all of us, need to learn from this Pope, and more important the Jesus he is trying to emulate. Those who do will not simply be recalled in history but be memorable.
The Oneida Community…
existed in the United States roughly in the middle of the 1800’s. It was a utopian community that practiced “complex” marriage, the understanding that every man and every woman in an Oneida community, and they lived in community with each other, were married. The idea was to achieve a kind of communitarian perfection by, in a regulated fashion, sharing everything, including each other. The Shakers, a religious community birthed in England but imported to the United States in the late 1700’s, practiced a strict form of celibacy among those who joined, even the married. The Latter Day Saints, an American religious movement birthed in the earlier 1800’s, adopted for a time the practice of polygamy. Even in the earlier years of our country there were experiments regarding the nature and definition of marriage, family, and sexuality.
Notice, however, that the Oneida community dissolved and turned into a commercial concern. The Shakers simply could not recruit enough members to make up for their aging celibates and only a handful, if any, remain. The Latter Day Saints eventually abandoned the idea of polygamy, except for a few small sects, and now actively for bid it. Have you heard about the “free love” communities of the 60’s? Neither have I. They’re probably around but most of the people who tried out this option have long since left.
And now we’re at it again, we Americans, following the paths of the trailblazers and “prophets” of a sort who decided that a new land needed new definitions of community, family, and marriage. Old ideas are out, and well just “old”, and we’re once again pushing at histories fences on these matters as if those people back then hadn’t a real clue about any of it. As they say “Those who forget the lessons of history…”
Of course these new experiments will fail just like the other attempts have failed. Men and women are designed by nature to be in a complimentary relationship with each other, a relationship which has mutuality, exclusivity, and family at its core. This will not change regardless of whatever laws or notions are enshrined in public policy. Our current sexual revolution is already on this failure track. Designed to free us from the “restrictions” of an imagined puritan past it has instead produced social, economic, and medical chaos. In the absence of any formal and social rules the rules written in nature have taken effect. The farther we get from one man, one woman, one lifetime, the more we experience the harsh repercussions of the law written in the fabric of the world.
That, I think is the real problem in all of this, not that we won’t return to some kind of moral sanity but rather what will happen until we arrive at that place. Sooner or later we’ll be overwhelmed by the data, the costs, the very real problems associated with our current attitude and the purveyors of the current order will one day be seen like we see cigarette company executives. It won’t matter if people heed the warnings of people of faith, the sheer and unfiltered evidence will one day find its way through the screens created by our leaders and into the common understanding. We will wake up one day and say “What were we thinking?” In fact its already under way.
Yet until then there’s going to be an increasing body count, a mounting list of tragedies, a growing list of problems from which we will have to recover. The observant Christian community, and I use the word “observant” because there are any number of “christian” communities that are in fact promoting the current agenda against the clear teachings of the Faith and, frankly, common sense, must be ready for these issues. We need to be a place of sanity in the present keeping our teachings intact and entire even in the face of extreme social opposition. We need to be a place of healing where the victims of this current vision, and they are victims, find a place of healing where they are not shamed or condemned but rather invited to join the community of strugglers seeking God’s grace and mercy. We will need to provide practical help for the very real social, emotional, and economic fallout of the current practices. There will be wounded, there already are, and the larger culture already pushes them out of view because their existence puts the lie to the dominant paradigm, yet we must build their care and recovery into the core mission of our outreach to the world.
Above all its time we in the Church got real about all of this. Not “real” in the sense of accepting what is going on but real in understanding it for what it is and what we need to do about it. The current experiments in marriage and family will one day be a historic footnote like the Oneida community, the Shakers, and Brigham Young with his flock of wives. Until then the time for us to be proactive and not reactive has arrived. Indeed its been with us for some time now.
While Scanning Facebook…
I became aware of this quote…
A description of mercy: “Every person that does any evil, that gratifies any passion, is sufficiently punished by the evil he has committed, by the passion he serves, but chiefly by the fact that he withdraws himself from God, and God withdraws Himself from him: it would therefore be insane and most inhuman to nourish anger against such a man; it would be the same as to drown a sinking man, or to push into the fire a person who is already being devoured by the flame.
To such a man, as to one in danger of perishing, we must show double love, and pray fervently to God for him; not judging him, not rejoicing at his misfortune.”
~ St John of Kronstadt
h/t to Michelle
Remember…
that if you look around, see the world, and then fall victim to panic, desperation, a desire for revenge, or anger, these are nor from God. Every bit of history remains in God’s hands and it will go well, even if this does not happen in the near future or even our life times. Instead, when you see the world as it is give your anxieties, frustrations, despair, and fear to God and, aware that the ultimate future is God’s, resolve even more to live this life, this beautiful path, to which we were called and overcome evil with good.
A While Ago…
In a prior post I wrote of how difficult it was, at times, to discuss current issues because of the lack of common ground upon which to define terms. Often we speak, as it were, different languages expressing world views that share very few common references. This particular article speaks to this in terms of the debates about the definition of marriage.
For some who are engaged in this debate the language of, or concepts about, morality are simply irrelevant and therefore inadmissible in the larger discussion. Or perhaps it may be better to say that there is a selection process under way. Each of us chooses to “cherry pick” our positions alternately selecting those moral concepts that agree with our position and disposing or declaring irrelevant those which may not agree. So if you favor marriage regardless of gender its in your best interest to change the grounds of the debate by automatically ruling out a significant argument against it, namely that virtually all major religions define marriage in heterosexual parameters. So you’ll hear people talking about “separation of church and state” even though it did not mean then and does not now mean that religious or moral ideas are excluded from the public debate or laws. Evidence of moral continuity over time is relabeled as “bigotry”. This list goes on.
Yet the truth is we all do this and very few of live a consistent ethic within our moral framework. Yes, the Bible, as interpreted within the historic Christian tradition, doesn’t identify same-sex marriage as a norm but it also doesn’t support the exploitation of the poor, misuse of the environment, the list could go on. Which is worse, same-sex relationships or spiritual pride? Neither and both. Just as a person who supports marriage regardless of gender may consider the moral arguments against it to be irrelevant while at the same time supporting the moral argument, complete with Bible quotes, for justice of the poor, so many practicing Christians will also select certain passages, perhaps about sexuality, and downplay, say, Jesus command to practice peace. The truth is that Jesus defined marriage as between one man and one woman (Matthew 19:1-6) and also called us to not violently resist even those who would do us harm (Matthew 5:39). So the folks arguing for marriage as one man and one woman have Jesus on their side but so does the person with the bumper sticker that asks “Who Would Jesus Bomb?”
So, to the extent of our power cooperating with God’s grace, perhaps our encounter with the world on issues like marriage will at least challenge us as traditional Christians to support the validity of our argument with a life consistent, in all ways, with our ethic from the bedroom to the board room and everywhere in between. Let us try not to be guilty ourselves of the very thing we claim those who disagree with us practice. If we do this consistency will, in time bear out the truth of who we are and more importantly who Jesus is.



